This is Weak.

 A lobbyist need not agree with all of his clients’ positions as a policy matter, any more than a lawyer need agree with all of the postitions his clients take in litigation. But it’s easy to make a lobbyist look bad by associating him with his clients’ causes.

But the rest of it is accurate, the whole “it’s his job it’s his duty” crap is well, crap, but it isn’t as though Fred! was Jack Abrahamoff, or even remotely as successful as Chelsea Clinton as a lobbying consultant, but that defense is just plain weak.

I got nothing

but apparently Ace has the inspiration to create something in the neighborhood of 165 give or take posts today.